. Energy News .

Shortcuts costly when buying conservation from farmers
by Staff Writers
Knoxville TN (SPX) Mar 07, 2012

File image.

Farmers in the U.S. and the European Union receive billions of dollars in government subsidies each year to make changes in their operations that will improve the environment. However, a new study by Paul Armsworth, assistant professor in ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, finds that these government programs may offer very poor value for money.

Armsworth led an international team of researchers examining the performance of farm subsidies. Their findings indicate that designing subsidy programs that actually deliver promised environmental benefits is easier said than done.

Under these programs, farmers are paid to change their management practices to improve conditions for wildlife. For example, they might be paid to reduce the number of livestock they keep or amount of fertilizer they apply. Payments are supposed to compensate farmers for costs they incur for making the changes.

The researchers found common shortcuts in the design of farm subsidies undermined their environmental performance.

"Subsidy schemes of this sort are used all over the world," Armsworth said. "However, policymakers often make shortcuts when designing these schemes to make them easier to administer. For example, they might pay participating farmers all the same amount or allow anyone to sign up regardless of how suitable their farm is for providing wildlife benefits."

Examining more than 40 farms in northern England, the researchers conducted economic surveys. To understand wildlife impacts, they focused on how bird species respond to farm management actions. The survey results were analyzed using mathematical models that allowed researchers to explore different ways of designing farm subsidy programs.

The results revealed between 49 and 100 percent of the promised increase in bird numbers were often not met. Instead, most scheme designs greatly over-compensated farmers for costs they incurred and served primarily to increase farm profits.

By comparing alternatives, the researchers were able to identify which simplified policies were most problematic.

"Allowing payment rates to vary depending on where a farm is located is critical," Armsworth said. "Get that right and prospects for conserving wildlife on farms greatly improves."

The study is published in the journal Ecology Letters. Armsworth collaborated with researchers in Stirling, Copenhagen, Nottingham and Exeter on the research which was funded by the United Kingdom's Research Councils' Rural Economy and Land Use Programme, a collaboration between the Economic and Social Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, with additional funding from Defra and the Scottish Government.

Related Links
University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Farming Today - Suppliers and Technology

Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries


. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

The future of plant science - a technology perspective
Washington DC (SPX) Mar 06, 2012
Plant science is key to addressing the major challenges facing humanity in the 21st Century, according to Carnegie's David Ehrhardt and Wolf Frommer. In a Perspective published in The Plant Cell, the two researchers argue that the development of new technology is key to transforming plant biology in order to meet human needs. Plants serve as the conduit of energy into the biosphere, provid ... read more

TerraSAR-X brings lively winter view into focus

SOA gains control of China's oceanic surveying satellite

NASA Researchers on the Snow Patrol

Europe's Global Monitoring for Environment and Security Program Examined

Galileo to spearhead extension of worldwide search and rescue service

LightSquared Undertakes Search for New CEO

Galileo on the ground reaches some of Earth's loneliest places

China launches 11th satellite for independent navigation system

Brazil's Rousseff urged to veto new forestry code

Study shows earthworms to blame for decline of ovenbirds in northern Midwest forests

Floor of oldest forest discovered in Schoharie County

Paper giant 'pulping protected Indonesian trees'

Is Seaweed the Future of Biofuel

Meeting biofuel production targets could change agricultural lands

Sapphire Energy to License Earthrise Nutritionals' Spirulina

American Palm Oil Council Discusses Palm Oil Industry's Impact on Malaysian Ecosystem

1000th AllSun Tracker Installed

Natcore Technology Opens Solar Research Center

Solar Experts Gather for San Diego Solar Energy Symposium

CertainTeed PowerMax Solar Roofing Installation in Portland Marks Significant Milestone

Raytheon to Supply Wind Turbine Mitigation Technology to the Netherlands Ministry of Defence

Mongolia to tap wind power

Yorkshire officials OK Hull turbine plant

Wind farm on hold over bald eagle concerns

Greenpeace targets Australia mining

Beijing aims for coal reductions

Environmentalists in 'fantasy land', says Australia

Mozambique blocks Rio Tinto coal barging

Chinese governor lauds clamp down on birth agents

Rebel China village revolution unlikely to spread

Tibetan teen self-immolates in China: exile groups

China to spend $111 billion on police in 2012

Memory Foam Mattress Review

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement