. Energy News .




.
MILPLEX
EADS/BAE tie-up could face US opposition, analysts say
by Staff Writers
Paris (AFP) Oct 04, 2012


The European aerospace groups EADS and BAE Systems are exploring a tie-up that would create a global giant, but rivals in the United States might try to scupper the deal.

A tie-up between the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS), which controls aircraft maker Airbus, and British arms manufacturer BAE Systems would create a $45-billion (35-billion-euro) giant to US rival Boeing.

EADS and BAE aim to formally announce their plans by October 10, a deadline set by British stock market authorities that could be pushed back.

But US defence contractors might be able to block what is being presented as a merger of EADS and BAE, either by trying to buy BAE themselves or by lobbying US authorities.

An expert close to the matter noted that a public offer for BAE by a US company "could take place at any time up until the operation's approval by general assemblies of the two companies," i.e. EADS and BAE.

David Reeths, head consultant at the sector information provider IHS Jane's, said: "It's always possible that an American firm might throw their hat in the ring, but there are a couple of factors working against that happening, at least in a serious way.

"First, the proposed share structure of 40/60 BAE to EADS, the very factor that has lead to Lagardere's complaint that the deal is too favorable to BAE, seems to me to be specifically designed to make that unlikely," he said.

"Second, the US Department of Defense has stated their strong opposition to further consolidation of the major players within the US on competition grounds," Reeths added.

The French industrial group Lagardere, a minority shareholder in EADS, has complained about terms of the deal, which have pushed EADS share price sharply lower since it was first mooted.

Richard Aboulafia, an analyst at the US company Teal, said that an offer for BAE by a US group was "completely unlikely. No US company really wants the drawbacks and liabilities associated with European firm ownership, even in the UK," he explained.

Any deal with a US company would also have to be vetted by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), on which overornamented ministries have representatives.

Almost half of BAE's sales are made in the United States and EADS hopes that a tie-up will provide it with better access to the biggest defence market in the world.

But "it's likely that US defence firms will try to paint all foreign owned firms as outsiders," Reeths said.

"However, there are a number of ways for EADS to mitigate against that, potentially including separate branding, high emphasis on their labour force and economic impact in the US and the relative independence of their US management structure, which will be a condition of their Special Security Agreement(s) that allow them to do work on sensitive US projects," he added.

Aboulafia thought that Boeing might campaign against the emergence of a major rival, but said that other US contractors are keen to continue cooperating with BAE on the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) programme.

Boeing has "the most to lose," because it "would be the only large aerospace company in the Western world with no JSF content," he said.

In 2011, Boeing managed to prevent EADS from obtaining a huge contract for air refueling tankers from the US Air Force.

But Aboulafia noted that Boeing had to be careful in opposing projects involving BAE "because Britain is a very big market" for the US group as well.

On a political level, the US Congress is currently focused on the country's presidential election, and has not yet reacted to the European plan, but EADS and BAE hope for a favourable welcome by US lawmakers.

Former French admiral Jacques Lanxade, an ex chief of staff of the French armed forces pointed out that "the United States calls on Europeans to take their responsibilities with respect to foreign policy, which includes a strong defence industry."

Aboulafia noted however that the argument of a more self-reliant Europe would not wash if Europe continued to cut its defence budgets.

"Why did you bother to go through all the hoops to create an integrated and efficient Franco-German company like Eurocopter (an EADS subsidiary), when you're not buying its combat helicopters," he asked.

Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries


Leading defence firms 'not transparent enough': study
London (AFP) Oct 04, 2012 - A large majority of the world's biggest defence companies do not provide enough evidence that they adequately prevent corruption, campaigners Transparency International UK said in a study on Thursday.

The pressure group analysed the top 129 global defence firms and has published its Defence Companies Anti-Corruption Index, which grades from A-F how effectively companies combat corruption.

Almost two thirds, or 85 companies out of 129, were judged to have inadequate information available on their anti-corruption policies, and scored the bottom grades of D, E or F.

"Two-thirds of the world's biggest defence companies do not provide enough public evidence about how they fight corruption," Transparency International UK said in a statement.

"This includes companies from all of the ten largest arms exporting nations like USA, Russia, Germany, France, the UK and China -- who between them are responsible for over 90 per cent of the arms sales around the world."

Those registering the bottom F grade included Abu Dhabi Shipbuilding, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, French arms manufacturer Nexter, Israel Military Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

French aerospace group Dassault Aviation, Japan's Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, and US naval defence group DCNS were among companies which scored an E grade.

Nearly half of companies, or 60 firms out of 129, scored the worst grades E and F, meaning that they had very little or no evidence of having basic systems in place to prevent corruption and instil strong ethical values.

"Corruption in defence is dangerous, divisive and wasteful. The cost is paid by everyone," said Mark Pyman, author of the study and director of Transparency International UK's defence and security programme.

"Governments and taxpayers do not get value for their money and clean companies lose business to corrupt companies. Money wasted on defence corruption could be better spent."

The campaign group estimated that the global cost of corruption in the defence sector was a "minimum" of $20 billion (15 billion euros) per year, and cited data from the World Bank and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Transparency added that just ten companies scored in the top two bands -- A and B -- meaning that they have publicly demonstrated in considerable detail the systems and procedures that they have in place to prevent corruption.

Those ten companies included Britain's BAE Systems, France's Thales, Japan's Fujitsu and US groups Northrop Grumman and United Technologies.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



MILPLEX
Lawmakers looking at BAE-EADS merger plan
London (UPI) Oct 3, 2012
The proposed merger of aerospace and defense conglomerates BAE Systems PLC of Britain and the Netherlands' EADS NV is coming under government scrutiny. The Defense Committee of Britain's House of Commons is to begin an inquiry into the proposed joining of the companies and the possible effect such a move would have on the country's defense industry and national defense relationships wit ... read more


MILPLEX
Digital Map Products to Discuss the New Rules for Communicating with Residents

Apple CEO sorry for maps shortcomings

China may toughen laws on 'illegal' mapping: state media

Radar altimetry gains altitude in Venice

MILPLEX
Northrop Grumman to Improve Performance of MEMS Inertial Sensors for DARPA

Lockheed Martin Delivers Propulsion Core for the First GPS III Satellite

China launches another 2 navigation system satellites

Improved positioning indoors

MILPLEX
Climate change cripples forests

Semi-dwarf trees may enable a green revolution for some forest crop

Rangers losing battle in Philippine forests

Indonesian palm oil company loses permit on illegal logging

MILPLEX
Turd-eating worms clear air around Canadian toilets

Biorefining: The new green wave

Napiergrass: A Potential Biofuel Crop for the Sunny Southeast

Most biofuels are not green

MILPLEX
Eclipsall Solar PV Panels Featured in Veridian Headquarters Rooftop Solar Array

Optimism Sets Tone As Solar Power International Makes First Visit to Southeast

New Manitoulin Island Hotel to be Powered by Eclipsall Solar PV Panels

Panasonic HIT Photovoltaic Cells Demonstrate High PID Resistance

MILPLEX
Bigger wind turbines make greener electricity

EU wind power capacity reaches 100GW

Lawsuit fights Obama ban on wind farm sale to Chinese

US bars China wind farm deal on security grounds

MILPLEX
Australian coal projects mega polluters?

Australian coal basin may be top 10 polluter: Greenpeace

Coal mining jobs slashed in Australia

China mine accident kills 10

MILPLEX
Bo's son 'suspected in plot to poison wife': report

Chinese actress sues US website over Bo link claims

Ai Weiwei gets first big US show, shaped by his plight

Ferry crash raises Hong Kong harbour questions


Memory Foam Mattress Review

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement