 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Top Scientists Question Proposed Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
Washington DC (SPX) Mar 03, 2009 The New Fuels Alliance (NFA) is warning that California's efforts to reduce carbon emissions from gasoline may actually increase greenhouse gas emissions and worsen the state's dependence on dirty fossil fuels. Biofuels are being wrongly penalized by the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) which requires oil companies to reduce the carbon sold in their fuels by 10 percent by 2020. Under this proposal, all fuels are assigned a "carbon score" to reward the least carbon intensive fuels. But only biofuel is being singled out for so-called "indirect effects" thereby giving petroleum products a better carbon score and a competitive advantage. For drivers in California, it means they will be buying more dirty petroleum products and less of the cleaner renewable fuels. "This proposal encourages oil companies to sell dirty fossil fuels like Canadian tar sands instead of renewable fuels including advanced biofuels like cellulosic ethanol," said Brooke Coleman, head of the New Fuels Alliance. "Ironically, CARB's proposal to reduce carbon will just result in more carbon in our environment." Even more alarming to the Alliance, CARB's proposal puts up serious roadblocks to the development of more advanced biofuels from green sources like switchgrass. "These regulations will stifle advanced biofuels investment and derail the industry. California is moving the opposite direction of President Obama who stated in a recent speech it is critical to support advanced biofuels." Over 100 of the nation's top scientists are also questioning CARB's plan. In a letter sent to Governor Schwarzenegger, the scientists warned that: "this proposal creates an asymmetry or bias in a regulation designed to create a level playing field. It violates the fundamental presumption that all fuels in a performance-based standard should be judged the same way ...Enforcing different compliance metrics against different fuels is the equivalent of picking winners and losers, which is in direct conflict with the ambition of the LCFS." Click here to see the letter signed by 111 scientists from research labs such as the National Academy of Sciences, UC-Berkeley, Sandia National Labs, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MIT. Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Dezenhall Resources Bio Fuel Technology and Application News
Asia's biofuel dreams shelved as crude oil tumbles
Kuala Lumpur (AFP) March 2, 2009Hopes of a biofuel bonanza for Southeast Asia, raised when sky-high oil prices made the search for alternative fuels a priority, have been shelved as global fortunes and crude prices nose-dive. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Google
Facebook